It’s the lie they said we all agreed on but frankly nobody asked me. As we shuffle through the twilight zone that will forever hallmark the 20s, skepticism of our history deepens. One of the the falsehoods being etched in to the time capsules of our memories museum is an aggravated perception of oppressive systemic racism suffered by African Americans imposed upon them by who? Blanco Diablo. The white devil. Anglo Saxon males have had a tough go of it here in the twilight zone. They have become the default villain of choice for most social justice groups. With a counterfeit feminist movement enjoying forty some years of success, the new woke racism seems virtually unstoppable. Let’s explore the implications by reflecting on the results so far of the aforementioned (anti)feminist movement of the 70s, the notorious characters at the helm of it, and what it has really meant for mankind.

Birth control has been hailed for a century as a true turning point for womens rights. If you were to look closer in to the eugenics practices encouraged by credible medical figures, you would find for all intents and purposes this medication was not designed with a persons freedom of personal choice as the inspiration-that was merely a marketing spin post production and testing. The real reason birth control was invented with the collaboration of Margaret Sanger and her mad scientist buddy Gregory Pincus was to secure a future of the brightest and best-to paraphrase. “I am against women having sexual freedom,” Pincus said in a 1967 interview. “But I hasten to add that I am also opposed to sexual freedom among men.” At the time, the challenge was to prove that using progesterone and estrogen together would make you infertile-however trials like that were illegal. Sangar and Pincus did something that I almost admire if the whole thing wasn’t so deplorable-they ran trials for fertility methods and tested the drugs on women trying unsuccessfully to get pregnant. They told them, first you will get really really infertile, then after that-you might get pregnant. WOW. They chose specifically underdeveloped nations and told college girls that if they didn’t participate they would get bad grades and successfully sterilized half the participants in the program. They tested on men in nut houses and basically anyone they could get away with just to pump up the numbers for the FDA review. When they tallied up a paltry 130 for trial participants, Pincus began recording menstruation cycles (1279), pills distributed (40,000+) and triumphantly pregnancies (0-2). Kinda sounds like how I do my taxes lol. I mean, how this one chick I heard about does her taxes. Apparently this is a federal sweet spot because the number fluffing paid off. In 1960, birth control became legal and in an ironic twist, has resulted in more pregnancies conceived by lower social economic echelon and a significant decrease in pregnancies conceived by specifically subjects with higher education, blessed with generous financial means, or enjoy great success with their career path.

In the 70s women fought to enter the workplace. Something your history books won’t elaborate on is the financial data sets collected as a result of this movement. As it turns out, having a second income to contribute to the home will end up canceling itself out when factoring in the new expenses imposed by the absence of a homemaker. Yes, the 70s was the birth of the working woman.

But it was the death of the homemaker and the results have been catastrophic and sadly in vain. With the huge uptick of women entering the workplace, resulting in an increase of productivity, thus an influx of profit-an odd financial atrocity began developing with no one to the wiser. This influx of profit i mentioned, it had no designated place to go. Hedge funds were born and thus was the age of CEOs, private jets, and severance packages that should have been criminalized. Is any of this ringing a bell? Does anyone remember a tiny little financial discrepancy known as the year 2008? Yes that’s right. The womens right to work movement largely and unintentionally contributed to the greatest financial crisis of our time (so far, stay tuned). The financial bubble it was called is the exact thing I described when I said “huge uptick of women entering the workplace, resulting in an increase of productivity, thus an influx of profit with no designated place to land.” Another consequence of this landmark societal evolution was a generation of latchkey kids but here’s something you won’t hear about often, the dissolution of marital unions began here. Blame it on a lack of credibility attributed to the homemaker, but when the role of the homemaker was annihilated in the 70s, here’s what marriages lost as a result: you see, the title homemaker couldn’t be more literal. While the man was at work toiling away at a most likely uninspired livelihood, he had one thing he could look forward to when he got home that evening. His loving wife’s greet at the door, often quite excited to have adult interaction after 8 to 12 hours of mommy time-the homemaker was zealous to see her husbands return. She would reward his personal sacrifice with a meal that would reflect her gratitude. Her time during the day was devoted to running an efficient household that seemed effortless to the working man. She would choose furnishings and decor to celebrate his professional success and assist with optimization of the home. This included appliances, lazy boys, ever increasing in size televisions. The working man marveled at what he thought was magic and the homemaker honored his efforts by creating the life he deserved. She developed relationships with neighbors, scheduled dinner party’s and game nights. Some of these silly commitments were the only thing that finally broke the ice on a Thursday evening spent at the Jones’s from a Monday Night fight. The homemakers role wasn’t insignificant, irrelevant or marginal. It was and has proven to be in its absence: VITAL.

The anti-feminist movement has taught little girls that natural propensities to choose dolls over dragons, dream of Prince Charmings rescue, and excelling in domestic undertakings are a modernists blasphemy. If you take an honest look at the data sets, it’s not the modernists you will want to imitate. We are entering a truly post apocalyptic dark age. Yes, I said it. The apocalypse, it already happened. You survived it, pat yourself on the back. But we failed to preserve the true nature of humanity and have replaced it with a counterfeit version born in a Petri dish. I have lamented in the past about the decade I served in prison, how I survived it by treating it like a field study in a same Sex controlled environment. What that study taught me, was that women create homes, families and holidays. Men create government, war, and economy. I herald these findings so voraciously that to me they are hermetic. The modern anti feminist movement has demanded women relieve themselves of their natural purpose and instead take on something foreign and the purpose I suppose is that when we master both we will be better? I don’t think so. Marilyn Monroe wasn’t the brightest and she was certainly no feminist martyr but she said some pretty poignant things. My favorite is “women who seek to be equal with men lack ambition.” This equality fantasy that’s being spoon fed to all of us is a lie. I can’t think of a more efficient way to arrive at a totalitarian state than the pursuit of equality. With equality what will you sacrifice? Inspiration. Motivation. Innovation. Ingenuity. Societal development. Chew on the history of our mistakes and in part two we will discuss the woke racism. With the promises that the feminist movement made and the lies it perpetuates, let’s then consider the alarming potential for destruction in this latest equality of outcome scam.

Footnote:

Our children are being failed by a corrupt and abusive public education system, they are being neglected by parents that value trends and ideologies over protecting the vulnerable, and they are being maimed and castrated by real life Dr. Frankenstiens all in the name of identity politics, a hyper specific marginalization of society in the name of justice who demand equity of outcome for all therefore stifling innovation, individuality, and greatness. This movement has throughout history always resulted in atrocities imposed by figures such as Mao, Stalin, and Hitler. Many civilizations have notably collapsed in the wake of an era that obsesses over gender identity. What’s the real threat here? I’m not overstating it when I answer that with LIFE. I want to remind all of you fathers that might be reading this that the most important job you have is teaching your son what it means to be a man. You can’t count on the state, the school, or the pediatrician. We’re at a strange point of sexual singularity where a man in his 60s is sexually functioning higher than a young man in his 20s. This is a result of Porn replacing girlfriends, therapists replacing parents, and TikTok replacing Sunday School. Any one of you beholds the opportunity that you raise the man that changes the course for humanity.

Please don’t let him down.